SN EN 1090-2+A1:2024

Ausführung von Stahltragwerken und Aluminiumtragwerken - Teil 2: Technische Regeln für die Ausführung von Stahltragwerken

Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures - Part 2: Technical requirements for steel structures

SIA

Publikation: 2024-10-01224 SeitenICS: 91.080.13

Organizations adopting SN EN 1090-2+A1:2024 must understand its compliance requirements to ensure high standards in the execution of steel structures. This guide will walk you through the necessary steps to achieve EN 1090-2+A1:2024 compliance.

Why implement SN EN 1090-2+A1:2024 now

Implementing SN EN 1090-2+A1:2024 is essential for organizations in the Construction Materials & Buildings industry due to increasing regulatory pressure and customer demands. With the European Union emphasizing compliance to ensure safety and quality, companies face the risk of losing contracts if they do not adhere to these standards. Additionally, internal quality goals drive firms to align their operations with best practices, leading to improved efficiency and reduced liabilities. Organizations that prioritize compliance can enhance their reputation and competitiveness in the marketplace.

Prerequisites and readiness check

Before embarking on the journey to achieve EN 1090-2+A1:2024 compliance, organizations should ensure the following prerequisites are in place:

• Management Commitment: Strong support from leadership to drive compliance initiatives.
• Resource Allocation: Adequate financial and human resources dedicated to the project.
• Current Process Documentation: Existing procedures and workflows must be documented for review.
• Staff Awareness: Employees should be informed about the importance of compliance and their roles in the process.
• Quality Management System: An established quality management system aligned with international standards, such as ISO 9001.

Step 1: Gap analysis

Conducting a gap analysis is the first critical step toward achieving EN 1090-2+A1:2024 compliance. This involves assessing current practices against the standard's requirements. Start by identifying key inputs, such as existing process documentation, management policies, and operational procedures. The analysis will outline the process of comparing current practices with the EN 1090-2+A1:2024 requirements, identifying deficiencies and areas for improvement.

Typical findings from the gap analysis may include inadequate welding procedures, lack of proper documentation for mechanical fasteners, or insufficient corrosion protection measures. Tools such as checklists and compliance software can facilitate this process, allowing organizations to create a clear action plan to address the gaps identified.

Step 2: Design and documentation

Once the gap analysis is completed, the next step involves designing and documenting the management system to meet EN 1090-2+A1:2024 requirements. This documentation should include:

• Scope Statement: Define the boundaries of the management system, including the types of steel structures covered.
• Policy: Establish a compliance policy that reflects commitment to EN 1090-2+A1:2024 and quality management.
• Objectives: Set measurable objectives related to compliance and quality improvement.
• Procedures: Document procedures for welding, mechanical fastening, and corrosion protection, tying each to relevant clauses in the standard.
• Records: Establish a record-keeping system for all compliance-related documentation, including test reports and inspection records.

By aligning these elements with the specific requirements outlined in EN 1090-2+A1:2024, organizations can create a robust framework for compliance and continuous improvement.

Step 3: Implementation and training

Implementing the newly designed management system requires careful change management and effective staff training. Organizations should focus on the following:

• Change Management: Address potential resistance by communicating the benefits of compliance and involving staff in the implementation process.
• Staff Training: Conduct comprehensive training sessions to ensure all employees understand the EN 1090-2+A1:2024 requirements and their roles in maintaining compliance.
• Process Adoption: Encourage staff to adopt the new processes through hands-on workshops and continuous support.

Typical pitfalls during implementation include insufficient training, lack of clarity in roles, and inadequate monitoring of compliance processes. To mitigate these issues, organizations should prioritize ongoing communication and support throughout the transition.

Step 4: Internal audit and certification

Internal audits are essential for verifying compliance with EN 1090-2+A1:2024. The purpose of these audits is to assess the effectiveness of the management system and identify areas for improvement. Audits should be conducted periodically, following a structured approach:

1. Stage 1 (Documentation Review): Evaluate the documented management system against EN 1090-2+A1:2024 requirements to ensure all necessary documents are in place.
2. Stage 2 (Implementation Review): Assess the actual implementation of the management system, focusing on processes, personnel involvement, and adherence to established procedures.

Successful internal audits lead to a smoother certification process, where external auditors verify compliance and issue the necessary certification, affirming the organization's commitment to quality and safety.

Common pitfalls

When implementing EN 1090-2+A1:2024 compliance requirements, organizations often encounter several common pitfalls:

• Lack of Management Commitment: Ensure leadership is actively involved and committed to compliance efforts.
• Inadequate Training: Provide comprehensive training to all staff members to avoid misunderstandings of requirements.
• Insufficient Documentation: Maintain thorough records to support compliance claims and audits.
• Ignoring Customer Requirements: Align compliance efforts with customer expectations to remain competitive.
• Neglecting Continuous Improvement: Treat compliance as an ongoing process rather than a one-time effort.

By addressing these common mistakes proactively, organizations can enhance their chances of successful implementation and certification.